data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20195/20195cb44db35d0f494ec3e8972cc536e8c47a99" alt=""
..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61365/61365f0b4c402dae8fc00e47a326f696baf47d24" alt=""
Religion and Theology Reference Division of Hekman Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calvin College and Calvin Theological Seminary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://theologyreference.blogspot.com
Longman describes himself as representing "an evangelical approach to the Old Testament." He gives a brief annotation for each commentary mentioned and categorizes each as suitable for the Layperson (L), Minister (M), or Scholar (S) (or some combination of these categories). He also rates each commentary on scale of one to five.
Carson's commentary recommendations take the form of brief bibliographic essays (4 to 8 pages); one for each New Testament book. He avoids a formal rating system, but his comments give one a good feel for the strengths and weaknesses of the commentary literature on each book.
Glynn's book is more ambitious than the above two, with a more comprehensive coverage of other biblical reference resources. For each book of the Bible, he classifies commentaries as either "Technical/Semitechnical" or "Exposition." He also assigns one of four different classifications to each commentary (See p. 17 for his explanation of these criteria):Additionally, he highlights (in bold type) those commentaries he highly recommends. For some (though not all) commentaries he gives a few descriptive phrases, but overall his evaluative comments are few. For each biblical book he also includes a list of "special studies" which cannot be classified as commentaries.
- "Evangelical"(E)
- "Evangelical/Critical"(E/Cr)
- "Conservative/Moderate"(C/M)
- "Liberal/Critical"(L/C)